বৃহস্পতিবার, ২০ ডিসেম্বর, ২০১২

Genetic defect causing fragile X-related disorders more common than thought

Dec. 20, 2012 ? A single genetic defect on the X chromosome that can result in a wide array of conditions -- from learning and emotional difficulties to primary ovarian insufficiency in women and tremors in middle-aged men -- occurs at a much greater frequency than previously thought, research led by the UC Davis MIND Institute has found.

The research is based on the first large-scale, multi-center newborn screening effort for the defect in the United States, conducted in a group of more than 14,200 male and female infants at three research university medical centers piloting a new infant screening test developed at UC Davis.

The study, "FMR1 CGG Allele Size and Prevalence Ascertained Through Newborn Screening in the United States," was led by Flora Tassone, professor-in-residence in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, and was conducted using blood spots obtained from infant heel pricks as part of the normal newborn genetic screening process. It is published online Dec. 20 in the journal Genome Medicine.

The investigators examined the prevalence of expanded alleles of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. Defects in FMR1 cause conditions as diverse as fragile X syndrome -- the leading cause of intellectual disability and the leading known single-gene cause of autism -- and a Parkinson's disease-like condition called fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, or FXTAS. The term "fragile X" is used because of the altered appearance of the X chromosome among sufferers from the conditions.

"This study demonstrates that there is a higher frequency of mutations of the FMR1 gene across racial and ethnic groups than previously believed," said Randi Hagerman, medical director of the UC Davis MIND Institute and one of the world's leading experts on fragile X-related conditions. "It also demonstrates that newborn screening for fragile X mutations is technically feasible in a large-scale setting using the blood spot technique developed by Dr. Tassone."

The degree of disability from defects in FMR1 depends upon the number of repetitions of the sequence of the proteins cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) in the promoter region of the gene. The range of repeats in normal individuals is between six and 40. CGG repeats greater than 200 cause what is called the full mutation and fragile X syndrome. Fewer repeats -- in the range of 55 to 200 -- result in a variation called a premutation.

The current study found the estimated prevalence of the premutation to be 1 in 200 females, a finding somewhat greater than earlier estimates. However, it estimates the prevalence among males to be 1 in 400 -- double what had previously been reported. The researchers said that the sample size in the current study was not great enough to estimate the true prevalence of the full fragile X mutation, currently estimated at between 1 in 2,500 and 1 in 8,000 females and 1 in 5,000 males.

While most people with the premutation appear normal, some individuals can have mild difficulties in childhood, such as such as learning problems or emotional difficulties including social anxiety and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), said Hagerman, a professor in the Department of Pediatrics. Individuals with the premutation also can suffer from FXTAS, which causes debilitating tremors, balance problems and dementia primarily in older men, and premature ovarian insufficiency in women.

Tassone, a researcher affiliated with the MIND Institute, is one of the world's leading experts on screening and identification of the FMR1 mutation. Her polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based test used in the current study was described in January 2008 in the Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.

"This study shows that newborn screening for the FMR1 mutation is technically possible on a large scale," Tassone said. "However, the screening will identify far more carrier and gray-zone infants than those with a full fragile X mutation. As we now know that there may be clinical involvement with these individuals, such as FXTAS, we need to better understand the impact of identifying these mutations on families before widespread newborn screening can be instituted."

Hagerman said that the study is important because early intervention can be helpful for children with these mutations who experience developmental problems. In addition, a baby who is positive for the mutation will have other family members who also carry mutations. Genetic counseling is essential for the family members, in addition to treatment for the medical or psychiatric problems associated with the premutation or full mutation, she said.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of California - Davis Health System, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/most_popular/~3/-ofa125s2xI/121220195749.htm

ncaa basketball oikos kentucky wildcats oakland school shooting nike nfl jerseys katie couric barista

রবিবার, ৯ ডিসেম্বর, ২০১২

NFL Playoff Picture 2012: Current Playoff Teams Who Won't Make the Postseason

Well this is anti-climactic.

13 weeks into the NFL season, and there's not a lot of mathematical intrigue surrounding the playoff picture. Four?division leaders have already clinched, and two more hold leads of over one game.

As far as the Wild Card is concerned, it's not as up-for-grabs as it has been in recent years. There are hosts of teams hovering around the five- and six-win mark, but most of them don't appear serious about making a playoff push.

But if you dig a little deeper, there are a few current playoff teams who shouldn't get too comfortable with their current position.

Let's take a closer look at two teams who could be kicking themselves come?January:

?

Indianapolis Colts

People are talking like the Colts have already clinched a playoff berth. Which I get. They have a one-game lead over Cincinnati, who plays at Dallas this weekend. If the Colts beat Tennessee at home, and the Bengals lose to the Cowboys, they'll have a two-game buffer in the AFC Wild Card hunt.

I just don't think that's how it'll shake out.

FootballOutsiders.com??the most widely respected source of advanced football stats??has the Colts 27th in their Week 14 rankings.

Twenty-seventh.

That's below the likes of Cleveland, Arizona and San Diego. For God's sake, it's below the Jets!

Football Outsiders gives the Colts a 69.1 percent chance at making the postseason; the Bengals have a 58.1 percent chance. If either Cincinnati or Tennessee win this weekend, those number could be equal.

Especially considering the Colts still have to play Houston twice.

Pittsburgh, who's tied with Cincy (and still has to play a home game against them) is obviously at risk of dropping out too. But the numbers, along with their relatively easy schedule, suggest they'll be okay.

The same can't be said in Indy.

?

Chicago Bears

Yes, Chicago has the top-ranked defense in the NFL. And sure, they have a two-game lead on Washington and Dallas.

They're still in jeopardy of blowing a playoff berth for the second straight season.

Chicago's remaining schedule is anything but a gimme. They play at Minnesota this weekend, then host Green Bay in Week 15. Those are two very loseable games.

After that come road games with Arizona and Detroit, which seem innocuous at first, but could actually be traps for the Bears. Arizona has a top-five defense and Detroit has a top-10 offense. Units that good, on their home turf, are always a threat.

Especially with Brian Urlacher out for the rest of the regular season.

Washington, meanwhile, has one of the easiest remaining schedules in the NFL. Should they get by Baltimore at home this weekend, they'd only need to win at Philly, at Cleveland and vs. Dallas to go 10-6.

Exactly where the Bears would be if they finish 2-2.

Chicago and Washington are headed in opposite directions: The Bears have lost three of four, while the 'Skins have won three straight.

Don't be surprised if we wake up one morning and see that one ship has passed the other.

Source: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1437348-nfl-playoff-picture-2012-current-playoff-teams-who-wont-make-the-postseason

augusta national blake griffin pau gasol marlins park marbury v. madison 2013 lincoln mkz burger king mary j blige